Head to head
Kyle Pitts or George Kittle?
George Kittle was the stronger 2025 producer — 12.1 vs 9.8 half-PPR points per game, at essentially the same draft cost (ADP 94.2 vs 108.1). That gap is the case for George Kittle.
Our read, framed from the cited 2025 data below — opinion, not a projection.
Metric by metric
The tale of the tape
| Kyle Pitts | Metric | George Kittle |
|---|---|---|
| 94.2 (TE8) | ADP | 108.1 (TE9) |
| 97 | Overall ADP rank | 112 |
| 9.8 | Fantasy points / game | 12.1 |
| 22.7% | Target share | — |
| 23.8% | Target share, last 3 games (2025) | — |
| 73 | Sleeper search rank | 83 |
Purple marks the better figure. A dash means the engine did not cite that metric for that player. 2025 regular season via nflverse · ADP via Fantasy Football Calculator.
The consensus read
The market separates them by a hair — Kyle Pitts at ADP 94.2, George Kittle at ADP 108.1. On 2025 production it is 9.8 vs 12.1 half-PPR points per game.
What has to be true
This call flips on beliefs you can check. Each one is tied to the exact data point that confirms or denies it, with its current value.
Strong move if you believe…
-
Kyle Pitts's late-2025 target share is the new baseline, not a blip
Checkpoint: target_share, last 3 games vs season (2025)
23.8% last 3 vs 22.7% season (2025)
Poor move if instead…
-
Kyle Pitts's late-2025 target spike is small-sample noise that reverts
Checkpoint: target_share, last 3 games vs season (2025)
23.8% last 3 vs 22.7% season (2025)
Sources: Fantasy Football Calculator · Sleeper · nflverse. Every figure here is a value the analysis engine cited from the underlying data. Stats are 2025 regular season via nflverse (CC-BY 4.0); ADP via Fantasy Football Calculator.
FantasyTools analysis is opinion for entertainment purposes only — not betting, financial, or professional advice.