PPR vs Half-PPR vs Standard: Who Rises and Falls (2026 Rankings Shift)
One table, three reception rules: every skill player’s points and rank in standard, half-PPR, and full PPR — the 2026 season so far, or the full 2025 season one tap away — plus exactly how many spots the format moves him.
PPR vs Half-PPR vs Standard Shift
The 2026 regular season through Week 8, three reception rules — see whose rank moves when every catch scores.
No QB tab: quarterbacks don’t catch passes, so their ranks shift by a spot or two at most across all three formats.
Swipe sideways for std, half and PPR
| Player | Team | Pos | G | Rec | Std pts | Std rk | Half pts | Half rk | PPR pts | PPR rk | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | SEA | WR | 7 | 58 | 138.2 | 2 | 167.2 | 2 | 196.2 | 1 | +1 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Jahmyr Gibbs | DET | RB | 7 | 34 | 161.8 | 1 | 178.8 | 1 | 195.8 | 2 | −1 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| CeeDee Lamb | DAL | WR | 8 | 60 | 108.3 | 14 | 138.3 | 5 | 168.3 | 3 | +11 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Kenneth Walker III | KC | RB | 7 | 22 | 138.1 | 3 | 149.1 | 3 | 160.1 | 4 | −1 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Bijan Robinson | ATL | RB | 8 | 25 | 128.3 | 4 | 140.8 | 4 | 153.3 | 5 | −1 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Trey McBride | ARI | TE | 8 | 66 | 84.4 | 24 | 117.4 | 17 | 150.4 | 6 | +18 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Kyren Williams | LAR | RB | 8 | 33 | 117.0 | 9 | 133.5 | 7 | 150.0 | 7 | +2 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Christian Watson | GB | WR | 8 | 42 | 104.8 | 15 | 125.8 | 12 | 146.8 | 8 | +7 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Jonathan Taylor | IND | RB | 8 | 21 | 123.2 | 6 | 133.7 | 6 | 144.2 | 9 | −3 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Christian McCaffrey | SF | RB | 7 | 34 | 110.0 | 13 | 127.0 | 11 | 144.0 | 10 | +3 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | DET | WR | 7 | 53 | 88.0 | 22 | 114.5 | 18 | 141.0 | 11 | +11 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Jaylen Warren | PIT | RB | 8 | 25 | 115.8 | 10 | 128.3 | 9 | 140.8 | 12 | −2 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Tee Higgins | CIN | WR | 7 | 43 | 96.6 | 19 | 118.1 | 16 | 139.6 | 13 | +6 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Puka Nacua | LAR | WR | 6 | 56 | 82.6 | 26 | 110.6 | 22 | 138.6 | 14 | +12 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Javonte Williams | DAL | RB | 8 | 20 | 117.2 | 8 | 127.2 | 10 | 137.2 | 15 | −7 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Derrick Henry | BAL | RB | 8 | 12 | 124.7 | 5 | 130.7 | 8 | 136.7 | 16 | −11 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Chuba Hubbard | CAR | RB | 7 | 22 | 111.0 | 12 | 122.0 | 14 | 133.0 | 17 | −5 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Ashton Jeanty | LV | RB | 8 | 37 | 95.3 | 20 | 113.8 | 19 | 132.3 | 18 | +2 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| James Cook | BUF | RB | 7 | 12 | 119.7 | 7 | 125.7 | 13 | 131.7 | 19 | −12 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Matthew Golden | GB | WR | 8 | 43 | 88.5 | 21 | 110.0 | 23 | 131.5 | 20 | +1 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Bucky Irving | TB | RB | 8 | 18 | 112.6 | 11 | 121.6 | 15 | 130.6 | 21 | −10 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Ja'Marr Chase | CIN | WR | 7 | 43 | 85.2 | 23 | 106.7 | 25 | 128.2 | 22 | +1 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Chris Olave | NO | WR | 7 | 49 | 75.6 | 30 | 100.1 | 28 | 124.6 | 23 | +7 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Brock Bowers | LV | TE | 6 | 41 | 82.7 | 25 | 103.2 | 26 | 123.7 | 24 | +1 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| D'Andre Swift | CHI | RB | 7 | 22 | 100.8 | 18 | 111.8 | 20 | 122.8 | 25 | −7 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Zay Flowers | BAL | WR | 7 | 40 | 82.2 | 28 | 102.2 | 27 | 122.2 | 26 | +2 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Malik Nabers | NYG | WR | 7 | 48 | 72.5 | 33 | 96.5 | 29 | 120.5 | 27 | +6 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Bhayshul Tuten | JAX | RB | 7 | 15 | 103.3 | 16 | 110.8 | 21 | 118.3 | 28 | −12 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Tony Pollard | TEN | RB | 8 | 14 | 102.5 | 17 | 109.5 | 24 | 116.5 | 29 | −12 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Garrett Wilson | NYJ | WR | 8 | 43 | 70.7 | 38 | 92.2 | 30 | 113.7 | 30 | +8 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Isaiah Likely | NYG | TE | 7 | 41 | 71.5 | 35 | 92.0 | 31 | 112.5 | 31 | +4 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Drake London | ATL | WR | 8 | 39 | 70.8 | 36 | 90.3 | 33 | 109.8 | 32 | +4 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Tetairoa McMillan | CAR | WR | 7 | 42 | 66.9 | 42 | 87.9 | 34 | 108.9 | 33 | +9 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Michael Wilson | ARI | WR | 8 | 45 | 63.7 | 47 | 86.2 | 39 | 108.7 | 34 | +13 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| George Kittle | SF | TE | 7 | 34 | 70.5 | 39 | 87.5 | 35 | 104.5 | 35 | +4 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| George Pickens | DAL | WR | 8 | 39 | 65.3 | 45 | 84.8 | 41 | 104.3 | 36 | +9 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Davante Adams | LAR | WR | 6 | 30 | 72.0 | 34 | 87.0 | 38 | 102.0 | 37 | −3 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Jameson Williams | DET | WR | 7 | 27 | 73.7 | 31 | 87.2 | 37 | 100.7 | 38 | −7 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Tre Tucker | LV | WR | 8 | 29 | 70.8 | 37 | 85.3 | 40 | 99.8 | 39 | −2 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Braelon Allen | NYJ | RB | 8 | 17 | 82.6 | 27 | 91.1 | 32 | 99.6 | 40 | −13 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | NE | RB | 8 | 23 | 75.9 | 29 | 87.4 | 36 | 98.9 | 41 | −12 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Luther Burden III | CHI | WR | 7 | 35 | 62.0 | 49 | 79.5 | 43 | 97.0 | 42 | +7 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Parker Washington | JAX | WR | 7 | 27 | 68.5 | 41 | 82.0 | 42 | 95.5 | 43 | −2 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Chase Brown | CIN | RB | 7 | 36 | 54.9 | 58 | 72.9 | 49 | 90.9 | 44 | +14 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | CLE | TE | 8 | 35 | 55.1 | 57 | 72.6 | 50 | 90.1 | 45 | +12 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Mike Evans | SF | WR | 6 | 27 | 62.0 | 50 | 75.5 | 46 | 89.0 | 46 | +4 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Tucker Kraft | GB | TE | 8 | 35 | 53.5 | 63 | 71.0 | 54 | 88.5 | 47 | +16 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Denzel Boston | CLE | WR | 8 | 26 | 60.9 | 51 | 73.9 | 47 | 86.9 | 48 | +3 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
| Quinshon Judkins | CLE | RB | 7 | 21 | 65.6 | 44 | 76.1 | 45 | 86.6 | 49 | −5 spots lower in PPR than in standard |
| Justin Jefferson | MIN | WR | 6 | 28 | 58.4 | 54 | 72.4 | 51 | 86.4 | 50 | +4 spots higher in PPR than in standard |
Showing 50 of 351 players.
How it works
The three formats differ by a single rule: what a reception is worth. Every catch scores +1 point in full PPR, +0.5 in half-PPR, and 0 in standard. Nothing else changes — yards and touchdowns pay the same everywhere. So the whole comparison reduces to two exact formulas applied to each player’s actual catch total for the season you pick:
half-PPR points = standard points + 0.5 × receptions
full-PPR points = standard points + 1 × receptions
The table computes half and full PPR from receptions rather than trusting three separate totals, so the relationship is exact by construction (the build also asserts the identity against the source data). The Shift column is the player’s standard rank minus his PPR rank: positive means he rises when receptions score, negative means he falls. Because a reception is literally the only variable, shift is a pure measure of how much of a player’s value lives in his target share.
Who rises, who falls
The archetypes are consistent every season. Risers are players who catch a lot of passes relative to their scoring: satellite and third-down backs, slot receivers, and target-hog tight ends. Fallers are the mirror image: two-down grinder backs and TD-dependent boundary receivers whose points arrive in yardage chunks and short scores, not catches.
The 2025 data makes it concrete. Cade Otton (TE, TB) caught 59 passes and climbs from No. 147 in standard to No. 113 in full PPR — a 34-spot rise, about 3 rounds of draft value in a 12-team league. At the other extreme, Tank Bigsby (RB, PHI) caught just 3 passes all season and slides from No. 171 to No. 220 once every catch scores. Same players, same season — the format alone moves them 83 combined spots.
Pure rushers with near-zero receptions produce the most violent negative shifts — that isn’t a bug, it’s the whole point of the comparison. Quarterbacks are excluded because they don’t catch passes; their rank barely twitches across formats. Kickers and defenses have no receptions at all.
Which season the table shows
The table opens on the 2026 regular season through Week 8, with the full 2025 regular season one tap away. Week 8 still had one game to play when this snapshot was taken. The 2026 view defaults to players with at least three games and shows games played in every row. The reception arithmetic is identical in both seasons — only the catch totals differ. Both are regular-season actuals via nflverse.com (CC-BY 4.0); the 2026 numbers are a snapshot from .
Related scoring tools
- Points per first down rankings — the next scoring wrinkle after receptions: paying for chain-movers.
- Boom/bust consistency rankings — which of these players earn their season total steadily vs in spikes.
- Instant fantasy point calculator — score a single stat line in all three formats.
Next step
Score any stat line in all three formats at once.
Score any offensive stat line under Standard, Half-PPR, or PPR.
Open the fantasy points calculator