Head to head
Matthew Stafford or Caleb Williams?
Matthew Stafford was the stronger 2025 producer — 20.6 vs 18.7 half-PPR points per game, at essentially the same draft cost (ADP 105.5 vs 109.9). That gap is the case for Matthew Stafford.
Our read, framed from the cited 2025 data below — opinion, not a projection.
Metric by metric
The tale of the tape
| Matthew Stafford | Metric | Caleb Williams |
|---|---|---|
| 105.5 (QB13) | ADP | 109.9 (QB14) |
| 109 | Overall ADP rank | 114 |
| 20.6 | Fantasy points / game | 18.7 |
| +7.5 | Points over expected (FPOE) | +4.6 |
| 103 | Sleeper search rank | 15 |
Purple marks the better figure. A dash means the engine did not cite that metric for that player. 2025 regular season via nflverse · ADP via Fantasy Football Calculator.
The consensus read
The market separates them by a hair — Matthew Stafford at ADP 105.5, Caleb Williams at ADP 109.9. On 2025 production it is 20.6 vs 18.7 half-PPR points per game.
What has to be true
This call flips on beliefs you can check. Each one is tied to the exact data point that confirms or denies it, with its current value.
Strong move if you believe…
-
Caleb Williams's scoring over expected regresses to the xFP baseline
Checkpoint: fpoe (actual minus xFP per game), season (2025)
+4.6 pts/gm vs expectation (2025)
-
Matthew Stafford's scoring over expected (xFP) is skill, not variance
Checkpoint: fpoe (actual minus xFP per game), season (2025)
+7.5 pts/gm vs expectation (2025)
Poor move if instead…
-
Caleb Williams's scoring over expected (xFP) is skill, not variance
Checkpoint: fpoe (actual minus xFP per game), season (2025)
+4.6 pts/gm vs expectation (2025)
-
Matthew Stafford's scoring over expected regresses to the xFP baseline
Checkpoint: fpoe (actual minus xFP per game), season (2025)
+7.5 pts/gm vs expectation (2025)
Sources: Fantasy Football Calculator · Sleeper · nflverse. Every figure here is a value the analysis engine cited from the underlying data. Stats are 2025 regular season via nflverse (CC-BY 4.0); ADP via Fantasy Football Calculator.
FantasyTools analysis is opinion for entertainment purposes only — not betting, financial, or professional advice.